<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Beatles Mono vs. Stereo (Remastered CDs Coming Sept. 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/</link>
	<description>Rob&#039;s video guitar lessons and music blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:53:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>jack nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Wow!  I&#039;m glad I found this site!  I am a Beatles fan my self.  Keep sharing!

Thanks and goodluck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  I&#8217;m glad I found this site!  I am a Beatles fan my self.  Keep sharing!</p>
<p>Thanks and goodluck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modica</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Modica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Good job on this post! It&#039;s nice to see somebody who knows what they&#039;re writing about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job on this post! It&#8217;s nice to see somebody who knows what they&#8217;re writing about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minna hau</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>minna hau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Thanks man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claude</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-72</guid>
		<description>great stuff  Rob. I purchased the mono collection after listening to both sets mono and stereo with looseless audio (flac).Im on a waiting list for the stereo set. Mid November Im told for delivery. thanks Claude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great stuff  Rob. I purchased the mono collection after listening to both sets mono and stereo with looseless audio (flac).Im on a waiting list for the stereo set. Mid November Im told for delivery. thanks Claude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jins</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>jins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Rob -- This is an amazing post -- extremely helpful &amp; informative for Beatles fans who aren&#039;t audiophiles...thank you so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8212; This is an amazing post &#8212; extremely helpful &amp; informative for Beatles fans who aren&#8217;t audiophiles&#8230;thank you so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob...it&#039;s been a while. I read your excellent review of the remastered Abbey Road , any opinions on the rest of the set? Unfortunately my local record store wasn&#039;t able to get any boxed sets in. Seems the demand has been unrelenting and I guess from my area unexpected. I managed to download MMT and on the whole wasn&#039;t what I expected. Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob&#8230;it&#8217;s been a while. I read your excellent review of the remastered Abbey Road , any opinions on the rest of the set? Unfortunately my local record store wasn&#8217;t able to get any boxed sets in. Seems the demand has been unrelenting and I guess from my area unexpected. I managed to download MMT and on the whole wasn&#8217;t what I expected. Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Alex, the first four albums were indeed recorded in stereo.  When the Beatles CDs came out in the U.S. in 1987, the first four albums were released in mono only, but I grew up listening to the stereo versions on vinyl.

The Capitol boxed sets that came out a few years ago include many of those early songs in stereo.  The new remastered albums are also available in stereo.  Listen to my clips in &lt;a href=&quot;http://goodrob13.com/2009/07/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-part-2/&quot; title=&quot;http://goodrob13.com/2009/07/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-part-2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt; to hear the difference between some of those early songs in mono vs. stereo (&quot;Please Please Me,&quot; &quot;Long Tall Sally,&quot; &quot;If I Fell,&quot; &quot;I Should Have Known Better,&quot; etc.).  Scroll up to hear my clip of &quot;Anna (Go to Him)&quot; in this post, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, the first four albums were indeed recorded in stereo.  When the Beatles CDs came out in the U.S. in 1987, the first four albums were released in mono only, but I grew up listening to the stereo versions on vinyl.</p>
<p>The Capitol boxed sets that came out a few years ago include many of those early songs in stereo.  The new remastered albums are also available in stereo.  Listen to my clips in <a href="http://goodrob13.com/2009/07/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-part-2/" title="http://goodrob13.com/2009/07/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-part-2/" rel="nofollow">Part 2</a> to hear the difference between some of those early songs in mono vs. stereo (&#8220;Please Please Me,&#8221; &#8220;Long Tall Sally,&#8221; &#8220;If I Fell,&#8221; &#8220;I Should Have Known Better,&#8221; etc.).  Scroll up to hear my clip of &#8220;Anna (Go to Him)&#8221; in this post, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob. Yes you&#039;re right. After a bit of research I realised that this was the case. Unfortunately like many others I got caught up in the enthusiasm of it all and there seems to be SO MUCH conflicting info on the net that it gets confusing. Initially I was 100% into purchasing the stereo remasters but now I&#039;m not so sure. I&#039;m quite happy with my 1987 Cd&#039;s and after listening to some samples on other sites the difference seems to be mainly in volume. I&#039;ve heard the full version of the remastered Magical Mystery Tour and was not to impressed with All u need is love - can hardly hear the drums and they are severely panned right. Penny Lane sounded pretty much the same as the 87&#039; remaster as did SFF. IATW had some interesting effects with strings going from right to left. Seems to be a tough decision though I&#039;m starting to think this may have been a money making decision on the part of EMI to capture the last remnants of a dying technology. BTW were the first 4 Beatle&#039;s albums recorded &amp; mastered only in Mono? I can&#039;t seem to get a clear answer on this anywhere on the net. B&#039;coz if this was the case I don&#039;t see how they could&#039;ve remastered these into stereo. Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob. Yes you&#8217;re right. After a bit of research I realised that this was the case. Unfortunately like many others I got caught up in the enthusiasm of it all and there seems to be SO MUCH conflicting info on the net that it gets confusing. Initially I was 100% into purchasing the stereo remasters but now I&#8217;m not so sure. I&#8217;m quite happy with my 1987 Cd&#8217;s and after listening to some samples on other sites the difference seems to be mainly in volume. I&#8217;ve heard the full version of the remastered Magical Mystery Tour and was not to impressed with All u need is love &#8211; can hardly hear the drums and they are severely panned right. Penny Lane sounded pretty much the same as the 87&#8242; remaster as did SFF. IATW had some interesting effects with strings going from right to left. Seems to be a tough decision though I&#8217;m starting to think this may have been a money making decision on the part of EMI to capture the last remnants of a dying technology. BTW were the first 4 Beatle&#8217;s albums recorded &amp; mastered only in Mono? I can&#8217;t seem to get a clear answer on this anywhere on the net. B&#8217;coz if this was the case I don&#8217;t see how they could&#8217;ve remastered these into stereo. Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Alex, the new Beatles remasters are *not* remixed.  The stereo CDs feature the same hard-panned mixes we&#039;ve been listening to for the past few decades.

Maybe someday, the entire Beatles catalog will be remixed and available in a higher resolution format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, the new Beatles remasters are *not* remixed.  The stereo CDs feature the same hard-panned mixes we&#8217;ve been listening to for the past few decades.</p>
<p>Maybe someday, the entire Beatles catalog will be remixed and available in a higher resolution format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.goodrob13.com/2009/04/26/the-beatles-mono-vs-stereo-remastered-cds-coming-sept-2009/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodrob13.com/?p=461#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I think the comparisons given here between the 87&#039; or prior stereo mixes/remixes with mono mixes may not be an accurate way to judge the difference between the 2 formats in relation to the current box set releases for the following reasons:
1/ The 87&#039; stereo Cd&#039;s used 1987 technology and basically just remastered the old mixes.
2/ The hard panning found in those Cd&#039;s where u may hear only 1 instrument left and something else on the right is not really used anymore.
3/ I&#039;m assuming that the current stereo boxed set has been remixed to reflect this modern approach to mixing.
4/ So...in some ways the &quot;new&quot; stereo mixes should be the best of both worlds. A nice even sound but with subtle left &amp; right effects and the &quot;punch&quot; of mono. Possibly something along the lines of some of the songs on the Love album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the comparisons given here between the 87&#8242; or prior stereo mixes/remixes with mono mixes may not be an accurate way to judge the difference between the 2 formats in relation to the current box set releases for the following reasons:<br />
1/ The 87&#8242; stereo Cd&#8217;s used 1987 technology and basically just remastered the old mixes.<br />
2/ The hard panning found in those Cd&#8217;s where u may hear only 1 instrument left and something else on the right is not really used anymore.<br />
3/ I&#8217;m assuming that the current stereo boxed set has been remixed to reflect this modern approach to mixing.<br />
4/ So&#8230;in some ways the &#8220;new&#8221; stereo mixes should be the best of both worlds. A nice even sound but with subtle left &amp; right effects and the &#8220;punch&#8221; of mono. Possibly something along the lines of some of the songs on the Love album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

